For EDITORS

For READERS

All Issues

Vol.14, 2024
Vol.10, 2020
Vol.9, 2019
Vol.8, 2018
Vol.7, 2017
Vol.6, 2016
Vol.5, 2015
Vol.4, 2014
Vol.3, 2013
Vol.2, 2012
Vol.1, 2011
Volume 8, Number 3, 2018, Pages 915-927                                                                DOI:10.11948/2018.915
Inverse problems in magneto-electroscanning (in encephalography, for magnetic microscopes, etc.)
Alexandre Sergeevich Demidov
Keywords:Inverse problems, integral equations, pseudo-differential operators, magneto-electroscanning
Abstract:
      Contrary to the prevailing opinion about the incorrectness of the inverse MEEG-problem, we prove its unique solvability in the framework of the system of Maxwell''s equations [3]. The solution of this problem is the distribution of ${\bf y} \mapsto {\bf q}({\bf y})$ current dipoles of brain neurons that occupies the region $Y \subset \mathbb{R}^3 $. It is uniquely determined by the non-invasive measurements of the electric and magnetic fields induced by the current dipoles of neurons on the patient""s head. The solution can be represented in the form ${\bf q}={\bf q}_0+{\bf p}_0\delta\Big|_{\partial Y}$, where ${\bf q}_0$ is the usual function defined in $Y,$ and ${\bf p}_0\delta\Big|_{\partial Y} $ is a $\delta$-function on the boundary of the domain $Y$ with a certain density ${\bf p}_0$. It is essential that ${\bf p}_0$ and ${\bf q}_0$ are interrelated. This ensures the correctness of the inverse MEEG-problem. However, the components of the required 3-dimensional distribution $ {\bf q} $ must turn out to be linearly dependent if only the magnetic field ${\bf B}$ is taken into account. This question is considered in detail in a flat model of the situation.
PDF      Download reader